Scores55 Tech B.V.

Scores55 Tech B.V. — a licence worn correctly, a family that halved overnight, and the paperwork most desks still get wrong

This is a cluster file with two dates on it, and both matter. Through the summer of 2026, Scores55 Tech B.V. — a Curaçao operator, registration 162990 — ran one of the best-rated casino families in our catalogue on a single licence, CGA OGL/2024/1307/0748, which we certificate-verified domain by domain. Five brands, four of them rated Very High by a major watchdog, clean game-integrity checks, and a footer presentation that gets the post-reform licence rules exactly right.

Then, on 16 October 2026, the family halved. Three of the five brands — KatsuBet, Mirax and 7Bit — left the licence in a single day for a new operating company, and this piece now covers both things at once: the estate as it stands, and the era that just closed. The licence itself remains active and correctly worn. The desks, meanwhile, remain wrong about this family in every direction — crediting it with brands it never held, and attributing its brands to companies that stopped existing for them years ago. The register, as usual, is the only clean copy.

The October rotation — three brands out in a day

We re-check licence certificates on a schedule, because a certificate is a snapshot — this is the file that proves it twice. On 16 October 2026 the scheduled re-read of the Scores55 certificate came back shorter: katsubet.com, miraxcasino.com and 7bitcasino.com no longer appeared on the approved-domain list. The same day, all three sites carried an identical new footer declaring a new operating company — Saphirix Solutions SRL, a Costa Rica entity under a declared Tobique Gaming Commission licence. Two independent first-party records changing in step: a confirmed migration, disclosed by the casinos themselves the day the register moved. We have opened a separate investigation on the destination.

What remains on this licence, per the operator's own certificate: mBit Casino, RocketPlay with its numbered mirror fleet, and one further approved domain we have not yet matched to a live brand. The certificate also records the licence's start date — 16 July 2024 — which anchors this estate's era precisely at both ends for the brands that left.

Our method for events like this is era discipline, not rewriting. The scores, terms and clauses we documented at KatsuBet, Mirax and 7Bit were read under Scores55; they are those brands' previous era now, preserved in their files and re-verified from scratch under the new operator before we cite any of them as current. This page, from here on, is about what stayed.

Two estates, one waypoint

Scores55's place on the industry map was always genealogical. When the Dama N.V. estate — one of the largest casino families of the last decade — broke up, it did not migrate as a block: it fragmented into at least two successor operators in two jurisdictions. One line went to Novatrix SRL, a Costa Rica company on a Tobique licence, and carries King Billy, Winz.io, PlayAmo and their siblings — we document that family separately. The other line came here: Scores55 Tech B.V., on a Curaçao licence. A separate thread joined later from a second historical estate — Mirax arrived carrying stale paperwork from Hollycorn N.V., whose registered address Scores55 happens to share; we read that as a corporate-services address, an adjacency and nothing more.

October's rotation turns the convergence point into a waypoint. The ex-Hollycorn thread and two ex-Dama threads have now moved on together to a third company — for those brands, the third operator in roughly three years — while what stays at Scores55 is ex-Dama only. The brand persists; the company holding it keeps changing. That is the single most important thing to understand about this corner of the market, and it is why every number we publish carries a date.

It is also where the desks keep failing. One 2026 industry desk describes Scores55 as the operator group behind BitStarz, PlayAmo, KatsuBet and Winz.io. Of those four, exactly one was ever a Scores55 brand — and it left in October. PlayAmo and Winz.io are first-party verified with Novatrix in our files, and BitStarz sits with a third, unrelated operator, certificate-verified. The desk has collapsed three companies into one. We state it this plainly because the error keeps being republished: same historical origin, different operators, different licences, different jurisdictions. Never merge them.

The family, current and era

Current members, per the operator's certificate:

Era members — departed 16 October 2026: KatsuBet (9.4 Very High in its Scores55 era, the joint-second score in our catalogue), Mirax (9.0 Very High) and 7Bit (9.1 Very High, running since 2014). Their records, including those scores, are pinned to the era that ended in October and continue in the new operator's file. One continuity datum worth recording: at least one of the three kept its affiliate-program branding unchanged through the move — the commercial layer did not blink.

The honest summary of the rotation's effect: this estate's “best-rated family in our catalogue” standing was built on five brands, and three of the four Very Highs walked out the door. What remains is still strong — a 9.2 flagship verified end to end, and a very large second brand — but the crown now describes the July era, and we say so rather than quietly re-fit it.

The paper, done right

Credit where the record supports it: this is the estate that wears a modern Curaçao licence correctly. The live verification seal in the footer, the entity named in full, the registration number, the licence number matching the regulator's certificate — we checked, domain by domain, and it held. This very week we documented an estate whose eleven domains all carry licence text their register contradicts; Scores55 is the opposite case, and the contrast is the point. Correct presentation costs an operator nothing, which is exactly why its absence elsewhere is informative.

Two caveats keep the praise honest. First, tier: this is still a single offshore licence, and no footer presentation changes what that tier can and cannot enforce for a player. Second, the stale-attribution fog is thicker here than almost anywhere we cover: third-party pages still credit these brands to Dama N.V., to Antillephone, to “Curaçao eGaming”, to licence strings from 2023 — and as of this autumn a fresh stale layer is forming, as desks go on crediting the three departed brands to Scores55. Every review we run on this family leads with the correction, and will now lead with the date as well.

The dispute-route gap

The one structural weakness a player cannot work around here is what happens when a dispute goes wrong. There is no independent complaints body anywhere in this estate. The terms keep complaints internal, and past that point the route is arbitration — with the arbitrator selected by the operator — under a liability clause that caps the operator's total exposure at €100, the lowest ceiling in our catalogue, read first-party in the flagship's own terms. Set that against jurisdictions whose framework gives players a named external referee, and the gap is the defining trade-off of this family: excellent operational record, near-zero formal recourse if the record ever stops being excellent.

That is not a prediction of trouble — the watchdog file here is genuinely clean by this tier's standards. It is arithmetic: a 9.2 rating describes how disputes have gone; the €100 clause describes what you are owed if yours goes differently. Both are true at once, and a reader deserves both.

The turnover split and the fine print

The single most important reader-facing rule in this family is the deposit-turnover split. Deposits must be wagered before withdrawal — ordinary enough — but the multiplier depends on where you play: at the flagship, first-party, it is 1× on slots and 10× on tables and live games, with a fee clause attaching below the threshold. The split is the estate's constant; the slots multiplier is the variable — the departed sister brands carried a steeper one in their era here — and we will pin RocketPlay's figure the moment its terms pass completes. If you deposit to play blackjack or live roulette anywhere in this family, read the turnover clause first; it is the difference between withdrawing tonight and wagering ten times your deposit.

The rest of the flagship's file cuts both ways, and we list it the way we read it. Generous: withdrawal ceilings denominated in crypto at roughly the most liberal levels we track, with progressive jackpots explicitly paid in full above them; high table limits with none of the €3-max-bet straitjacket we document elsewhere; dormancy handled without monthly fees. Sharp-edged: an abandonment clause that forfeits funds in accounts untouched for 36 months; self-exclusion wired so that it blocks your own pending withdrawals — use the cooling-off tool instead if money is still in flight, and involve support deliberately for a by-request exclusion; and a lobby that varies by coin, because per-coin provider lists mean some currencies silently lose entire studios — deposit in the wrong coin and the live-dealer suite you came for is not there. None of this is hidden; all of it rewards reading before depositing.

On the protective side, the flagship's responsible-gambling tooling is the deepest we have read in this tier — limits that can only loosen after a delay and a confirmation, denominated in the currencies players actually use. It also quietly disproves an industry excuse we keep meeting: that crypto deposits cannot be limit-capped. Here they are.

Names to keep apart

The Dama diaspora produced successor operators whose brand names nearly collide, and getting them wrong is now a four-way hazard. 7Bit — formerly of this estate, now with its new operator — is not 21Bit, which belongs to the other Dama successor. RocketPlay, which stays here, is not Casino Rocket, which belongs to a different successor again. The watchdog scores, complaint histories and terms of each belong to each: a reader who searches one name and lands on its near-twin inherits a stranger's record. We keep these firewalls explicitly in our files, and after October they cross operator lines — which is precisely when the mix-ups multiply.

Bottom line

Cover per-brand, lead with the paper — and now, always, with the date. The Scores55 that remains is a two-brand estate with a correctly worn, certificate-verified licence, a flagship rated 9.2 with its terms read end to end, and a very large second brand whose own verification pass is our next action. Its real trade-offs are structural and stable: the 10× table-turnover leg, the coin-dependent lobby, and above all the dispute route — no referee, an operator-chosen arbitrator, €100 of liability.

And it is an estate in motion. Half of it left in a day, disclosed properly, caught the same evening because the certificate was being watched. We re-check that certificate weekly; if the family changes again, the register will say so before any footer does, and this page will say so the same day. Reviews of these brands older than mid-October 2026 describe a bigger family than exists — date your sources, including ours.

Information accurate at time of research (16 October 2026) — licensing records, terms and third-party listings change; we re-verify on a rolling basis. KatsuBet, Mirax and 7Bit operate under a new company since 16 October 2026 and their era-specific records are being re-verified under the new operator; figures cited here for the remaining estate are first-party where stated.